Bioidentical Hormones are identical in molecular structure to the hormones naturally occurring in women
A trial completed by the Women’s Health Initiative, otherwise known as the WHI, combined estrogen and progestin—as Prempro—for hormone therapy, with the aim of preventing later life ills. However, the trial was stopped shortly after it started, in 2002, due to the fact that the hormone users were found to have a higher risk of breast cancer, heart disease, stroke, and blood clots. This risk was found to be small; however, clinicians decided that even the minimal risk involved was too much to risk continuing the hormone treatment. As a result, many of those participating in the trial found that the typical treatments involved with menopausal symptoms—such as hot flashes and sleeplessness—returned worse than possibly ever before. While hormone therapy is still considered the best treatment for these symptoms, many women are concerned about possible side effects and, as a result, are seeking alternatives, according to an article recently completed by Harvard Health Publications.
Several alternative choices in treatment are presented in the article. Often, women pursue such treatments that are referred to as “natural” alternatives. However, the article cautions that that term can be used loosely. Technically, Any product whose principal ingredient has an animal, plant, or mineral source can be considered natural. One example is in the form of the soy plant, which is the source of supplements that some women take to ease menopausal symptoms. In addition to this, it’s also used to make the estrogen in the FDA-approved hormone drug Estrace. However, seeking the use of soy plants is a risky endeavor, despite being the “natural path of choice; soy supplements aren’t regulated and haven’t been rigorously tested in humans, making it relatively impossible to know whether they’re safe or effective treatment options.
Another possible alternative discussed is bioidentical hormones. This treatment plan was prompted by the pursuit of natural treatment options, as bioidentical hormones are identical in molecular structure to the hormones naturally occurring in women. They are, however, not found naturally; are made, or synthesized, from a plant chemical extracted from yams and soy. Even knowing this, the process is often referred to as “natural hormone therapy,” as bioidentical hormones act in the body just like the hormones naturally produced and occurring. Despite the fact that the composite used to produce bioidentical hormones muddles the natural, the treatment is still able to maintain the title, as the body can’t distinguish bioidentical hormones from the ones produced by the ovaries. The treatment has several benefits, namely allowing the estrogen levels to be monitored more precisely and, therefore, allowing treatment to be individualized accordingly. However, skeptics alternatively counter this argument, saying that it hardly matters, as no one knows exactly what hormone levels to aim for; therefore, opponents of the treatment believe symptoms, not hormone levels, should be treated and monitored.
